RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Instatuitions will need to get in..........I suppose it is personal intuition.
Eons ago there was a commonly held view, probably, at that time, more or less correct. There was the retail world of more or less ignorant little peons. And there was the respectable world of wise, prudent, and thoughtful institutional investors.
Many institutional investors want, of course, to keep that narrative alive today. It's good for business.
And if a company like Quarterhill wants to get market acceptance then it needs to have respectable meetings, all in business suits, etc., with respectable institutional investment people.
But I would suggest that things have changed on both the retail and institutional sides in ways that have made that narrative full of holes.
On the retail side, well, look what happened to GameStop. With the help of social media, retail investors have become more imaginative, more aggressive, willing to throw more of their money at ideas sitting in dark corners. Like, say, Rekor. And potentially, especially if profitability were to come along, something like Quarterhill.
And on the institutional side? I'd say that with the rise of hedge funds, venture funds, and perhaps also the rise of more of a quick-buck attitutde . . . well . . . I'd suggest that the institutional world has become less homogeneous than it used to be.
The upshot? Have more faith that if your story is truly compelling then they will find you, with or without the respectable suit-and-tie crowd.
People know about Quarterhill. They still see a company with a long history of losing money. Show them--with actual results--that that is changing for the better and they will come.