RE:RE:RE:RE:FYI: some comments re: profit/splitWell, they may not be wrong in a lot of cases as certain treaties are starting to prove out.
In this case, ENB obviously had a contract and permission to originally build and feel that contract is still valid. The court has decided that it may not be and the appeals process will prove that out one way or another but until then "trespass" is arguable.
Go Enbridge! ;-)
TimeBuilder wrote: We maybe wrong in our thinking
BUT firmly believe that the FN's
" think " we are ALL trespassing on their native lands ...
coast to coast to coast . JMO