RE:RE:RE:RE:Monster target at Albert Lake
Amber12 wrote: Mega
Thats great. Thank You
No problem. I think I used a specific gravity of 3.3 when I was calculating tonnages for the Voisey's Bay discovery back in the mid 90's. But the sulphides were hosted in troctolite bodies so that could make a difference. And I'm going by memory so I could be wrong about that specific gravity but I seem to recall using 2.5 to 2.7 for gold deposits, around 3.0 for copper deposits and 3.3 for nickel deposits.
But again the specific gravity is different for every deposit so we are only going with estimates and basically nobody knows for sure what is in the ground until they drill it so it doesn't matter a whole lot for us investors. Lol
I'm just amazed by the lack of interest in some of these exploration juniors these days. It's sad really. Such huge potential and here we have a nickel junior with two world class properties with literally dozens of targets and the market doesn't seem to get excited.