Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Verde Agritech Ltd T.NPK

Alternate Symbol(s):  VNPKF

Verde AgriTech Ltd is an agricultural technology company that produces potash fertilizers. The principal activity of the Company is the production and sale of a multi-nutrient potassium fertilizer marketed in Brazil under the brands K Forte and BAKS, Silicio Forte, and internationally as Super Greensand (the Product). K Forte is a potash fertilizer that is a source of potassium, silicon, and magnesium and micronutrients. BAKS is a combination of K Forte plus three other nutrients that can be chosen by customers according to their crops’ needs. It mines and processes its main feedstock from its 100% owned mineral properties, then sells and distributes the Product. Its Cerrado Verde Project is in Minas Gerais state, Brazil, which is a potassium-rich deposit, from which it is producing solutions for crop nutrition, crop protection, soil improvement, and increased sustainability. Its technologies are Cambridge Tech, 3D Alliance, MicroS Technology, N Keeper, and Bio Revolution.


TSX:NPK - Post by User

Post by nozzpackon Aug 19, 2023 7:28am
254 Views
Post# 35596082

CO 2 Credits…..To generate or to Buy

CO 2 Credits…..To generate or to BuyIgnoring the idiots comments, large emitters like Shell etc have the option to buy offsetting CO2 Credits or offset their emissions by generating their own CO2 credits.

Re the latter option , cogent arguments can be made that Shell would consider generating its own C02 credits and take advantage of tax credits and operating costs needed to generate.

Of course, there would be an accountancy consideration as well.

But, let's take the Amazonia reforestation Initiative and its  dual drivers of carbon consumption and sequestration.

Lets assume that Shell  makes decision to generate its own credits and buys Verde.

To start with, Shell has the capital to quickly catapult Verde as the major supplier of potash and its derivative fertilizers  to the Brazil  Agro market......small incentives , say $1 per acre , to farmers might be the initial inducement .

That market is now about 8 million tons per year , ....98% of which is imported.... which woul generate about 1.5 m tons of CO2 credits which if Verde/ Shell secured 75% of the Brazil potash market would generate about 1 m tons of CO2 credits for Shell.

Given how cheaply K Forte is produced, while noting the additional margin  benefuciation due to huge volumes of product..Shell makes a very fat profit from its fertillizer business.

With 1.3 billion tons in  potash Reserves, Verde has the LOM CO2   latency of permanently sequestering about 150 billion tons of CO2.
This of course would take decades but it is an asset that keeps on giving.

Now, Shell decides to get involved in a big way in the Amazon reforestation project from which it can generate not only permanent CO2 sequestration but also life cycle CO2 generation as those trees grow .
This is a rather simple process , the equivalent of the Bernanke helicopter money scheme in which seedlings and KForte are distributed by Helicopters to those deforested regions .

Shell gets the two sources of CO2 credits , tax credits , cost write offs and a huge publicity asset to mollify its customers .

We can see this type of CO2 asset buyout already happening .

Why not to Verde and its unassailable Potash reserves and derivative fertilizers ?

Even at $10 per share, the costs to Shell would be less than $350 m US .

Speculating of course, so let's hear the analytical rebuttals ..





<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>