RE:Has Persistence listing been approved in Principle ? This is, again, a perfect example how your portrait your unsubstantiated theories as fact. The resoning is here is exceptionally thin
- you quote from the Guidance Letters for New Applicants: https://en-rules.hkex.com.hk/rulebook/guidance-letters-new-applicants
"Following acceptance of a new listing application, we will issue a letter to notify the CIS Applicant of the stock code allocation arrangements. The drawing of the stock code can take place prior to the issue of the AIP and a confirmation of the stock code will be issued when we issue the AIP for efficiency."
Even though this means nothing in regards, if Persistance is accepted in principal (AIP), is literally quotes that the drawing of the stock code can take prior to the issue of the AIP.
- there is no credible source that Persistence is accepted in principal or credible source about the stock code
- to conclude from the information on https://www.moomoo.com/stock/810436-HK/financial/main-composition that persistence is AIP and to sell it as fact is simply stupid
- what about the code displayed at https://www.webull.hk/en/quote/hkg-n22052/news?
- Moomoo.com : 810436
- Webull : N22052
- HKEX uses a stock code nameing convention of 5 figures. There are no stock codes with 6 figures
There are manny examples of this behauvior. For me, i dont care about your frequent attacks every time you read something you dont like and wont fit your agenda. It is so obvious. But i want to encourage everybody here, to questioning the information presented here.