TheCardinal wrote: I've examined it now, also, and concur with your findings.
But based on other exchanges you've have with the entity
in question, surely you realise you're dealing with someone
of limited literacy, comprehension, and critical thinking; and
reasoning with such an entity is an exercise in futility.
Their entertainment value has waned. Now, they've become
nothing more than a tedious curiosity. My comparison to such
tragic figures as Macbeth and Iago was not made in jest.
I suggest to you what I've already suggested to "Maxmoe",
that we allow this entity to howl at the moon to their heart's
content. The problems they've created for themselves will
soon catch up with them.
CountOfMeltedCrisco wrote: I have just examined the actual Debenture Indenture as filed on the new SedarPlus database and there is
not one single sentence, paragraph, clause, or any other sort of verbiage mentioning
anything describing "SASB assets" and any such assets would have been described with
excruciating detail including descriptions and exact locations of such "pledged assets" had any
been pledged.
Document DEBIND042823.pdf
Under Trillion's SedarPlus archive size 828kb
Stop your
FILTHY LYING! TheLandedEagles wrote: You Too Stooges,,..Im convinced now you are both BRAIN DEAD!!!..To say BOUGHT DEAL respresents some kind of confidence and great support to in on that Debenture Finance...WHERE HAVE YOU BOTH BEEN, your both out of TUNE with the markets and how they work!!!! That bougfht deal was done by that broker(s)....AND that me only that broker had SUCKERS on the side to complete financing for Trillion on that BOUGHT DEAL ...and were guaranteed to get reimbursement (Broker Fees and warrents)..they themselves did not necessary be a party involved with that deal...Thats What bought deal means...Trillion was guaranteed those funds by the broker and they simply involved their clients, Customers, whom ever,....the was solely interested in their commission and broker warrants....THIS IS HOW THE PRIVATE PLACEMENTS, both Brokered or non brokered, Bought deal or no bought deal..Its very obvious both of you dont know WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT....As for that .60 cent exercise conversion has having that high price from the current price of the share then...really means little, and only means alot when the STOCK PRICE exceeds that exercise price and then the changes of being exercised, become more are more probable....on the flip side, should the share the stock price decline more and more,as we now see today....that change of conversion....come down to "NIL" as we stand today...as for that 12% interest...CEO had to in order to get the money...that 12% is the highest Ive seen for a while and then CEO , had to throw in the SECURITY and the Pledge of those SASB assets to obtain that money...as for that 4 month hold ...."HOLD"...IT ONLY STARTS ONCE when the debenture holders of that agreement do actually excerise and once they are in fact exercised...and are given to them the SHARES....then on that day of conversion and receipt of shares,...and they document that exchange of debt to actual shares. SO GO BACK TO THE CEO, and ask him why it was necessary to pledge those aseets and acquire that $15mm when he was at the same time publically stating on many PAID interview...SASB, was self FUNDING..within weeks he does this DEBENTURE!!!!..REALLY, and you continue to trust that man....I certainly dont!!!!!!!!!!!! Im not lying...he has, for many months now...I would go back and discuss that with him...NOW, we see why Markets have declined to support this company with any value to its share price currently....both of yous need to do more work and reseach to convince this board of your true intentions here....and your experience with these matters of FINANCE!!!!...have a great day.....