RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:beenthere Responds to My PostBoomskid wrote: No, no. It's ok, TT.
I'll stick with my views on things.
And you can make your case for the Sappy Cap flap.
What you posted was gibberish, but I'm sure you have the whole story.
We'll wait for you.
We all admire your smarts and knowledge.
We're confident you can explain it.
If you don't mind, though, (snicker, snicker...) I might go with the facts.
Say. Was it the Sappy Cap stuff that drove the partners away?
I thought it was because xB3 was no good.
I'm sure you'll explain the whole thing.
jd
I'll stick with my views on things You've been so right the past 15 yrs Johhny boy!
Thats why your bankrupt!!!
You are so absolutely clueless you missed the point of my post about Sabby.
I wish I could type slow, so you could comprehend.
Sabby has nothing to do with LT, bioasis, DR etc.
I brought up Sabby to give an example of how destructive Firms can be.
LT could just as destructive for similar reasons.
But in your blund stoooopidity, and conspiracy theories you think LT and everyone else wants xb3.
Because all your readn and studyn the internet and hittn them books made you smarter than the Scientists who passed on bioasis.
LT doesn't want a scam technology that reputable Scientists of reputable companies passed on.
Nice try Johnny boy.
Hey, forgot to ask, hows Julies asthma with the smoke from all those fires?
Man, those Davenports are one group of unhealthy pieces of work.