Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Acceleware Ltd V.AXE

Alternate Symbol(s):  ACWRF

Acceleware Ltd. is an advanced electromagnetic (EM) heating company with highly scalable EM solutions for large industrial applications. Its segments include High-Performance Computing (HPC) and RF Heating. The HPC segment sells proprietary high-performance computing software and related consulting services and training programs to the oil and gas industry. The RF Heating segment is engaged in research, development, and commercialization activities related to advanced electromagnetic heating using radio frequency (RF) energy. It is piloting RF XL, its patented low-cost, low-carbon EM thermal production technology for heavy oil and oil sands. It is also working with a consortium of potash partners on a pilot project using its patented and field proven Clean Tech Inverter (CTI) to decarbonize drying of potash ore and other minerals. It is actively developing partnerships for EM heating of other industrial applications in mining, steel, agriculture, cement, hydrogen and other clean fuels.


TSXV:AXE - Post by User

Comment by ScarletSpideron Aug 31, 2023 12:07pm
125 Views
Post# 35613971

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Axe might have problems in Alberta thanks to the UCP

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Axe might have problems in Alberta thanks to the UCPnope not at all did you even read the article I suggested? First read that understand what is going on here. Once you read that we will talk. Now as far as standing up I never said provinces shouldn't. Transfer payments will be a sore point for people but that is what the whole country was built on if you don't like that fact would you advocate to common wealth states which will be far more complex to have anything done and is never considered stable nobody will want to do business in Canada if that were the case. Why do you think that despite the constant sabre rattling when it happens that people who understand stability and economics don't want to see a sovereign Quebec. 

Now since we are on transfer payments and transfer of wealth what do you think about our medical system compared to that of the US? Without taxes "wealth" transfer we would have the same medical system as the US but we don't. The rich will biatch about paying too much taxes the poor will come back and say they aren't paying their fair share so nobody is happy under this scenario yet there are clear benefits for why things are what they are. 

You are only as strong as your weakest links. I think someone speaking as you have should consider who has a flawed perspective. 

As for the issue at hand what does it even remotely have to do with transfer payments? We are looking at the Feds putting punishing fines and penalties working from a carbon based economy system to control climate change which is by the way not unreasonable whatsoever. We kill our environment we will inevitably kill ourselves. As to how and what I feel I already gave that opinion at length I don't think I need to repeat it. But your comparison what you have raised is ludicrous sorry to say you are not even talking about what is going on and what the post is about. Transfer payments to me is a separate issue i don't see the relevance here unless you can establish one where I can say ok I got you and sure we can chat but I gave you my opinion.

When you have too many little areas each with their own rules and dealings vs a more united region you have way too many complexities and lack of stability as I mentioned. When confederation happened and each of the individual provinces entered systematically they did so with certain rights and expectations in which was agreed to and what you have is a Confederation that works under the parlimentary system in which transferance of wealth to provinces that need such monies has been all historically part of what Canada is whether people like it or not. But given the alternative this is the better choice as far as I am concerned or you can have a collapse like what happened in Russia and you see how much weaker economically Russia became. You chose the best of the two. You know what i have chosen.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>