RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:ShareholdersThinkbigsti69 wrote: GrahamB wrote: Thinkbigsti69 wrote: GrahamB wrote: dalesio_98 wrote: Shareholders ought to be concerned if the 2 individual's whom have AMF administrative proceedings launched against them return to work.
Will the BofD act with fiduciary responsibility and duty of care?
Precisely. The Quebec regulator, AMF, is also trying to prohibiting Pascali and nCurleigh to act as an officer or director of a reporting issuer for 5 years.
Why would they do this unless they had good information?
A red flag, coupled with the risk of insolvency, and fact they were prohibited by regulators from raising funds before
Seriously
Who do you trust -promoters on a stock board or regulators
All IMO
Dont rely on m,y thoughts and definitely not pumpers
Do your own dd
The question that should be raised is why are you posting constant FUD.
Again, back to you-why cant you discusss the financials, and recent regulatory concerns compared to attacking other posters? This is supposed to be a stock discussion board. Do you really think that it's responsible to promote a company, that has had a question about insolvencyimo,, and now regulatory actions being announced against it? how can you justify that? There are a number of posters on here that are asking these questions, yet you seem to think it's OK to insult them and make accusations.
Bashing and spewing FUD 24\7 is not a discussion
A factual discussion of the finances and recent regulatory actions against this company is not FUD. It is facts
Again back to my point, you refuse to discuss the company. You simply want to distract, smoki=e and mirrors, and talk about posters rather than about the company.
Why?
could it be that you don't want people to focus on the company and what's happening? Could it be you have no response?
Do you even acknowledge that this recent regulatory action that's proposed should not at least be addressed as a risk? Seriously.