PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Shareholders

[dalesio_98]

BCONTVentures wrote: Some great posts from ceo:

@PenKerGof @dalesio_98 your appearance on this board looks very similar to when northernman popped on here out of nowhere. My question to you, good Samaritan, is what are your motives here? Did someone reach out to you and asked for your services? on that note, what are your services and how much do you charge? Can I get a list of references of your past satisfied clients please?

@PenKerGof Also, yes there are corrupt characters out there and I for one DO NOT think Peter is one of those characters. You seem to think very highly of authorities, but I should remind you that majority of corruptions comes from high government officials (your so called authorities) ... ehmmm Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden just to name a few ;) n'est-ce pas. Do your own dd All IMO Good luck all!

@pennytodollar Also, as far as the info provided, the allegation looks like: Peter used a patent his dad owned < Peter's dad made a claim against him < the company came to the agreement to pay Peter's dad's company in a settlement < sometime before the settlement, Peter became Power of Attorney for his dad and defacto took control (to some degree at least) of his dad's company < stock price went up. As far as we know, all of this would have happened regardless of Peter being POA because the claim went against PYR before that happened and the company would likely have wanted to settle as that claim would likely be problematic for any customer buying that tech from PYR. Peter allegedly did NOT disclose that his father's company had become a related party through his POA over his dad at the time of settlement and this seems to be ultimately where the case stems from. Obviously AMF sees that as problematic, but I don't think anything would have been different for the actions of PYR throughout it all, which is why until we get a better idea of the actual accusation, and see it resolved in court, I'm not overly concerned regarding the company. Even if he gets found guilty of it, I don't even have a fundamental issue with the company paying that settlement and assume they would have either way.

@pennytodollar Curleigh didn't have a problem with it, nor KPMG or the follow up accounting company assessing for NASDAQ eligibility. AMF does.

@pennytodollar Further info revealed during hearings may impact my assessment of Peter, I don't think it will impact my assessment of the potential sitting in front of PYR.

You fail to provide my responses to their posted comments.