RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:More than 90% of Saskatchewan’s heavy oil sites I am not too sure what you mean power shortages? If you mean alternative energy not being used or what exactly i am confused. Assuming you are speaking oil and gas will be more heavily used and that the conservatives get in the way i fully agree with what Jefferey said that even if companies use fossil fuels cti is still better than the standard by 0 solvents 0 steam. Now if you are concerned about info coming from the company vs courts or whoever it wouldnt make sense for anyone with this perspective to add here and further not to start cutting back.
Like i said if you are unsure about things why add and gamble on something in which you may already have a sufficient position to start with. If i was unsure as you i would be looking to sell on the next bump whatever it may be in regards to the heating restarting that is what i would do if i have the doubts you are talking about. Now i am not saying for you to sell or not but saying if it were me that is how i would handle my positiion and it would make sense because when we see the bump we know that is in hand but what comes after we do not know.
There have been lots of companies who have bs embellished things and people got duped so you have a very legitimate point and concern. Again look what happened to petroteq and many other juniors so again smartest to take profit while there and extricate your principle as soon as you can. In any case like i said i have my moves planned broadly with axe and will organically act but i for sure would not be adding on uncertainty i would actually have a tough time actually holding the full position. Any fair size uncertainty better to shed some shares just from a logistic perspective and watch where things go and act accordingly. All i am saying is of my opinion only as a lay non qualified person to offer any advice which i am not giving just logistics and things to think about.