RE:RE:The AGM? I believe there are a lot of steps in between someone expressing interest in acquiring a public company and making an offer that needs to go to the shareholders for a vote. I don't know exactly what they are - but they are absolutely known to the people involved in either side of an acquisition - and with them being known - assuming the parties are working well towards a deal - I would say they the timing of them is controllable. Once they hit the point of having to disclose though - once those conditions are met and/or those things are done - your disclosure requirements are immediate.
It's been discussed on here before that public companies have 15 months after their last AGM to have their subsequent one - so I don't think delayed is the best word - but later than last year?! That works.
Personally - I don't think it's that hard to understand why. This is a company purpose built to explore, develop and dispose of the Ishkoday property (their words) - and expectations are that they will succeed. If I had to face my shareholders I'd want all the time o could get to deliver on each of these items.
We now know that they have received at least one offer - my guess is that it was in play last year and expected to close. Except it didn't. Stuff happens I guess. Maybe one day we'll know what happened. But we do know that whatever mineralization was on the property last year - is still there - we know that every single share the people who know the most own is still owned today - none sold at all - we know their objectives haven't changed and we know that the team assembled to realize all three objectives - including a transaction has never been broader, stronger, more diverse or more on point - specifically on the transaction side. All great things - no matter when the AGM is.