RE:RE:RE:Is this the week?I wonder how much time management has been spending on this endeavour vs. trying to drum up new business. It sounds like a big waste of resources. They might just propose something for the sake of it.
The next question is whether collusion amongst the BoD and management is present? Collectively, they own almost 50% of the company. It appears that they both have something to gain by privatizing at this point in time. Prudence dictates that they should scrap this self-opportunistic proposal while still in its infancy altogether.
And, yes as LR suggests, they shouldn't link the RoC and privatization ideas together. I think they should scrap the RoC idea and return us to the $0.20 annual dividend as they had pre-Covid. This would undoubtedly unlock value. A $2.00/sh price would still yield a 10% annual dividend. They could guarantee the dividend for another 3 years and still have some of the would-be RoC funds available. With FID, etc happening long before then, a lot of this frustration would be non-existent.
The only reason I see for this proposal being suggested at this point in time is for the BoD's and management's gain.
JJ