GrahamB wrote: Stanny1 wrote: Ignore him GrahamB. He can't even spell your name right. They have no sales. Sales means revenue. They have no revenue. Not complicated. I am long. Have been for about 7 years. Luckily only down a bit so i am hopeful this company can get some sales. But his posts are ridiculous. Not worth commenting on. His insults show his lack of intelligence. ( oh and by the way, why are you against childrens health---what a hilarious comment)
Thanks for your comment. This is what I think as well. If there is demand, there should be sales and revenue, and if the revenue is significant, the margins will be there, and there will be a real opportunity.
In the history of the company this hasn't happenned despite millions spent on marketing, travelling to and sponsoring conferences...
Regarding Jo- I think he actually does more harm than good to the stock, despite the fact he’s trying to be a promoter. He never responds with any facts or his own thoughts. Just reposts others thoughts from CEO .
Yes, the appeal to the children , and trying to draw me in was pretty low. Then again, it is a classical logical fallacy, so called argumentum ad passiones, basically, manipulating someone’s emotions to win an argument, , especially used in the absence of facts