Quentin30Everyone please read one of our bashers recent post. It may be the worst argument against Pela anyone has written and yet he continues to post his nonsense on a daily basis.
1. He thinks the CR we had in our Panc trial was because the person ate something or experienced a placebo effect which cured his Pancreatic Cancer.
2. He says we engage in too many unpowered trials yet we need more data to determine if our Panc results were any good. Despite PanCans selection of Pela.
3. He says Pelas exclusivity to us will lapse in 2028 and we can add pixie dust to it. Does anyone have any?
4. There is no institutional interest. Despite that $15 million an institutional healthcare investor just invested.
5. We were granted approval for Phase 3 in MBC but the data was statistically insignificant. Both things can't be true or we wouldn't have been approved for Phase 3.
I can't say this often enough... He says the PR we had in Panc is because the person ate something or experienced a placebo effect!!! If this is your guy for info, you need to find a new guy.