RE:Interesting GMT Response"I responded to them stating that I agreed with their stance. I found one particular sentence interesting so thought I would share. I figured others may agree."
I still don't buy 100% into GMT's "late to the party" response/reaction to the StrathCona/Waterous deal that they ONLY NOW realize their getting so called "screwed". Imho, It may just be too little too late for anything to be done to stop it and could have carried more weight IF they had done this from the start a week in. Where was the outcry then? This seems more like a rift then anything else or some PR stunt to protect their rep.
As with folks like yourseldf and many others you've had concerstions or communications with them, you guys should have asked the ALL important question, WHY in GODS name did they stay SILENT for so long, waiting almost two whole months to say ANYTHING or voice their opinion JUST a mere week BEFORE the vote?
Some thing smells here both with the Strath deal & the TIMING of GMT's supposed "dissident poistion". And would pay good money to find out WHAT REALLY went down......
GLTA