Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nickel Creek Platinum Corp NCPCF


Primary Symbol: T.NCP

Nickel Creek Platinum Corp. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development company. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration and evaluation of nickel and platinum group metals (PGM) mineral properties in North America. Its flagship asset is its 100%-owned nickel-copper PGM project, located in the Yukon Territory, Canada (Nickel Shaw Project). The project is in the southwest of Canada's Yukon Territory, approximately 317 kilometers (km) northwest (NW) of the capital, Whitehorse. The Nickel Shaw Project is a large undeveloped nickel sulphide project, with a unique mix of metals including copper, cobalt and platinum group metals. The Nickel Shaw Project has access to infrastructure, located three hours west of Whitehorse via the paved Alaska Highway, which further offers year-round access to deep-sea shipping ports in southern Alaska. The Company also maintains environmental baseline activities, considers optimization alternatives and seeks other opportunities.


TSX:NCP - Post by User

Post by Wangotango67on Oct 08, 2023 7:56pm
115 Views
Post# 35675494

FIGURED IT OUT ?

FIGURED IT OUT ?Have to considers a few more variables...
Lines on NCP's graphic Chart are representing
Years 6 - 10

Ore Stratigraphy places magnetites atop the serpentines.
As one mines the ore body....
Eventually the miner will encounter the serpentine
geology.

STRATEGRAPHY
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53197043368_081a8903e4_c.jpg


1 - Select composite ores were chosen
      Who chose these ores ?

2 - 1100 kg composite ores were sent to " Sudbury "
      100 kg over the 1 metric tonne

3 - Bulk Concentrate is shown prior to entering extraction
      What was performed prior to label it = bulk concentrate ?
      Seen left side on image.
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53197441344_58b17d9d50_c.jpg

4 - Did the  original 1100 kg have any wastes ores removed ?
      Silica etc...?

5 - Even if, portion of waste ores were removed - grades of ore, 
      would  remain same - right ?

6 - What would constitue a more than doubling of, Mg ?
      should still be, 16.4% right ?

7 - other waste ores like ( silica ) removed =  would be replaced with, Mg ?
      Magnesium Nickel.

8 - Keep in mind this is a preconcentrate phase.
      It would take the removing of over 16% silica inorder to
      replace the 16% waste mass with over 16% Mg.

This would definitly - explain the more than double Mg values.

9 - Yet....what if....
     solid solution Nickel were in the silicates ?
     
50/50%

Nickel found that in the serpentinized rock about
one - half of the total nickel occurs as visible native nickel-iron;
the rest apparently is in the silicate structure of the serpentine. In the
fresh olivine and pyroxene, all the nickel appears to be in the silicate.


Page 7
https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/1223/report.pdf

Serpentine Nickel.... two kinds of nickel.
As i've mentioned before - solid solution Nickel
Green ColoredSilicates.

10 - Let's just assume the model of,
       Silicates removed.
       Replaced with.... Mg.
       Bulk Concentrate now has....more than double the Mg.
       More difficult than silicate Nickel.
    

11 - If there were any Nickel present in the Silicate would you
        remove the silicate ?
       If no Nickel in the silicate and replaced with Mg that has Nickel
       Then.... would a 0.26% Nickel be seen in a bulk con or should
       there be an  ( increase % ) of all the more nickel ?
       If original Mg percentages are 16.4% and supposing this is
       where all the Nickel resides - then....

      16.4% Mg = 0.26% Nickel
      35% Mg = All the more Nickel right ?

What does the nickel ( reference head grade ) say ( nickel % )
0.31% grade
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53241269688_14fbe29879_z.jpg

Should'nt Nickel be....
over 0.52%+ grade due to a more than doubling Mg ?


12 -  What about the other minerals too ?
        Should not the Bulk Con have increased, Pd, Pt, Au, Co, Cu ?

13 - Here is the mineral grades in which was used by XSP.
        Compare these 2 charts.

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53241372584_21cd30a2fc_b.jpg

https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53241269688_14fbe29879_z.jpg

14 - As for the sulphur in former post ?
        Maybe the 23.22% Sulphur is a recapture to use again ?
        ( cleaner con )


Open Thoughts...

Show me 1 Tonne ore
Tell me exactly what happened to the 1 Tonne to make Bulk Con.
If Mg is more than double and supposing this is where Nickel resides
Then...shoildn't nickel grade increase by more than double ?
If only 0.31% what was the purpose of, making the Bulk Con ?
0.26% original grade to 0.31% nickrl.
And more than double the Mg to deal with.

And if Mg is considered waste ores. ( they shouldn't be )
And if only 1/2 recoveries are achievable
Then....1/2 nickel would still be in the Mg ?
Whose getting the Mg ?
lol

And what if Silicate does contain nickel - no mention of
where the silica ends up ?

Iron credits
Silica nickel
Mg credit with potential nickel

If 50% extraction achieved
does this not match the 50% or so extraction achieved ?
Sounds like two concentrates ?
lol

I actually came across another nickel junior with
1/2 recovered nickel.
Same thought came to mind.
Waste ores are similar to extraction recoveries.
Near 50/50

Place this in the context of,
Concentrates do contain wastes ores...
Could waste ores be precieved as.... another concentrate ?

Ohhhhhhh.... the nickel markets.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>