RE:RE:RE:RE:This board is well equipped. It ties in with other assumptions the company made.
The assumption that somebody else would build a stainless mill for CNC to use in the PEA.
An assertion that a strategic would be secured by year end given the very long table.
A statement that no additional funding would occur post-Anglo, only for an equity raise to occur less than 24 hours later.
70 oil in the FS when current prices are over 20% higher. Eho knows what else will be found when the report is actually released.
Like sure, the headline looks good, but if "fine-toothed comb" due diligence hasn't turned up anything that looks even a little suss, then you suck at DD.
GLTA
N3tPr0phet wrote: All I will say is that I was 100% on point with respect to recoveries.
CNC withheld the nickel recovery % from the Nov 15 news release relating to the one and only pilot scale metallurgical program they performed, after disclosing pie-in-the-sky improvements from bench scale work on cherry picked core samples.
I pointed this out and was roundly lambasted as a hater who had no idea what I was talking about. Now, instead of the 62% figure everybody was circlejerking over, the much awaited feasibility study came in at barely 2/3 that.
Why would the company withhold such a key metric? Is this a sign of honest management?
idlefreebird wrote: PCGuy , i see no icebergs and my DD is done with a fine tooth comb...but your true point is no one should take others opinions and you should always do your own DD.. I've never followed charachters on this site , as to many that have no knowledge at all and need attention and think there going to save the world with there opinions ..Imagine people who aren't invested bringing there thoughts to something they no nothing about ...why would individuals waste there time ..now if someone would have knowledge and brake down the facts i would be willing to have a conversation ...but to babble well that's were the ignore button comes in..like you said do your own DD ..glta