RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:GOLD up $38.00 Teckpro
I hope TUDs arguments in court are way better than the fluff you posted. Your points would have no impact with a judge eg "new majority owners" - WHO KNEW ABOUT PERMIT!, "drilling on TC" - WHEN THEY KNEW ABOUT PERMIT!, "dilly dallying"????? Dude, get a grip
To me, the tunnel is not a big deal. It is just a bargaining chip. TUD has not even drilled along route, only SEA has. I would think the argument TUD is making in court relates to the CURRENT TC RESOURCE ie goldstorm. The argument would be that SEA needs to recognize that these deposits are being developed & they cant come back at a later date and say it puts the tunnel at risk.
In any event, the level of argument on this board seems to have degenerated into a kindergarten fight at recess.
Hope TUDs lawyers are better. Im sure they are.
TeckPro wrote: As many have said before (but you are so daft) that you just don't understand.
It's the renewal of a permit that was granted:
1) After many wasted years by SEA which also include dilly dallying and purchasing other properties shows clearly MTT was not a priority.
2) And under new majority TUD ownership.
3) Years of subsequent drilling at great expense by TUD and much better 2x grades vs SEA, found exactly where SEA wants to drill.
Too bad for SEA now. Governments make legal blunders all the time and the court will decide if common sense does not prevail.
As a very recent example the Liberals passed an obviously flawed C-69 "No More Pipelines" bill in 2019, and the Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional!!! Huge blow to the arrogant Liberals. Read and weep.
https://thenarwhal.ca/impact-assessment-act-supreme-court/