RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:GOLD up $38.00 So funny when you say Im a short or SEA plant. Really funny aside from getting hammered on my TUD position.
But you got me to look at SEA, at least their presentation. I've always had an idea of what they have, but wow, was I blown away:
- 2 oz Au per share while TUD has 0.07 oz Au per share (& that will go down as share count increases due to carry interest fundign).
I was blown away by this. The difference is even bigger by a large margin if you just inclued reserves and measured resource -660 lbs of Cu per share vs 9 lbs of Cu per TUD share
Of course, TUD will likely double in share count in next 2 to 3 years as they have to fund 100% of project, despite only owning 60%, to production decision. That will make numbers look even worse even when you factor in a growing resource base.
When you factor in 60% interest of TUD in TC but 100% of carrying the costs, makes ya wonder about KSM which is years ahead of us.
I would not have known all this detail if Fordster did not keep bringing SEA into this,
fordster wrote: You're absolutely wrong Larry. Tud has made Swiss cheese where the MTT is supposed to go. They have not drilled from directly above...nor has Seabridge completed the task. I would expect you to know this stuff...
Why is it that you hold off posting for a little bit and then you dominate our BB page with "balanced" (sarcasm noted) with nothing but negative, fearful made up facts that make Tudor look like we're doomed? It's the oldest trick in the book and another example that you're a short or a Seabridge plant.