Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Tudor Gold Corp V.TUD

Alternate Symbol(s):  TDRRF

Tudor Gold Corp. is a Canada-based precious and base metals exploration and development company. The Company has claims in British Columbia's Golden Triangle (Canada), an area that hosts producing and past-producing mines and several large deposits that are approaching potential development. The Company has a 60% interest in Treaty Creek gold project, located in northwestern British Columbia, which is host to the Goldstorm Deposit, a large gold-copper porphyry system, as well as several other mineralized zones. The Company's Treaty Creek property covers an area of approximately 17,913 hectares.


TSXV:TUD - Post by User

Comment by rockport1on Oct 17, 2023 5:21pm
139 Views
Post# 35687963

RE:RE:Seabridge does not have a permit for the MTT

RE:RE:Seabridge does not have a permit for the MTTI've found more detail fordster, and it does appear the originally proposed MTT route from 2014 does go straight through Goldstorm, Perfectstorm, and possibly even CBS/Orpiment.  I did not see any documentation of an altered route that you say Rudy proposed. 

The change of routing is still problematic. If they go further North, they would run into the GR2 area and the potenial of the Kyba Red Line.  South takes it closer to Eureka. I can't see Tudor agreeing to sterilize these zones prior to sufficient exploration.   It may be that SEA will have to choose the lesser evil in order to reach an agreement.  I can't see it being cheap either way.  This also assumes the geotechnical aspects are satisfactory.

On March 31, 2020, SEA did receive government approval to begin work on portions of the MTT. This did include TC claims: 390924, 392462, 392463, 392464, 392465, 251230.  Essentially, this is work on the Saddle Portal of the MTT.  It does not cover any sections with any known mineralized zones as far as I can discern.  Unless there is additional approvals that I am not aware of, none of the defined zones have been affected. However, given that the MTT does run through these zones,  how much work will Seabridge undertake with the complete route unresolved? It would be a gamble in my opinion. 

fordster wrote: You've nailed it rockport...all you have to do is look on the map and see that it will goes through PSZ and GS. ...and yes, it's very unfortunate for Seabridge as people keep posting "it's a sure thing" on our BB:it's not...not even close. As you stated, AMK and TUO disputed it from the get go.

Rudy had said he'd changed the rout but he hasn't (there's no place to go unless he builds a covered road). Thus we have Tudor doing what Rudy claimed he'd do through the courts.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>