RE:RE:RE:RE:Eldrico, I think you are bitter from your osisko experienceEvenkeel123 wrote: If you ask me, am I upset up the situation? Frustration is more the right word. No comlaints about the drilling or results, but certainly the plan going forward doesn't seem to make any sense. It's almost as if the company is now going to experiment themselves to see what they actually have without doing a 43-101 because they may be stuck with that number going forward, whatever it is. The same will happen to any results from the trucking/milling because I assume they have to tell us the results, right?
So Osisko is bulk mineable, and NFG has to be selective. All the gold is narrow veins, and in my opinion will end up being low tonnage and low ounzes. That is why the majors are not interested, and that bugs me a lot because it says alot, namely that NFG, the 2 principal bankers in the stock, may be stuck having to learn the mining business, and may take us a very long time to make any money here. Goldfileds put 1 billion into Windfall (Osisko) and not Queensway.
I wish you fellows here would start talking to management, ask the very tough questions, and see what gives. I think NFG knows that this deposit's size actually works against them in the sense that no company wants to buy a potential 100 year project, with very large upfront capital expenses.
If I was as doubtful as you about management and the deposit I would sell and move on to something I believed in thats saying if you are a shareholder but that's what I would do and Most investors I know would do