Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Baytex Energy Corp T.BTE

Alternate Symbol(s):  BTE

Baytex Energy Corp. is a Canada-based energy company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, development and production of crude oil and natural gas in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin and in the Eagle Ford in the United States. Its crude oil and natural gas operations are organized into three main operating areas: Light Oil USA (Eagle Ford), Light Oil Canada (Pembina Duvernay / Viking) and Heavy Oil Canada (Peace River / Peavine / Lloydminster). Its Eagle Ford assets are located in the core of the liquids-rich Eagle Ford shale in South Texas. The Eagle Ford shale covers approximately 269,000 gross acres of crude oil operations. Its Viking assets are located in the Dodsland area in southwest Saskatchewan and in the Esther area of southeastern Alberta. It also holds 100% working interest land position in the East Duvernay resource play in central Alberta.


TSX:BTE - Post by User

Comment by Kelvinon Oct 28, 2023 1:19pm
178 Views
Post# 35705718

RE:RE:RE:10 years "Tier 1" acreage/wells.

RE:RE:RE:10 years "Tier 1" acreage/wells.Yes we will but what throws me is Nuttal's and other's fixation on fcf as a performance metric and if fcf isn't impressive then it's a poor performing stock.

Well check out how fcf is calculated. Net income minus capex is what it essrntially boils down to. So a company could have impressive net income and zero fcf if they spent most of the money on capex.

My own opinion is to spend the money on capex. Grow reserves. The reserves will only increase in value imo.The basic accounting equation from financial accounting 101 is: Total Assets = Total Liabilties + Shareholders Equity. So for a given amount of Total Liabilties then if you increase Total Assets then you increase Shareholders Equity. Or in other words sp goes up without share buybacks, dividends or paying down liabilties.

But that's a bet that Total Assets will go up with increased reserves. What are the chances of that? My own opinion is that they are very high. Renewables have proven that they can't replace hydrocarbons ever and the mideast is in a slow motion disaster. Geez when you think about it North America can supply itself with energy for decades even if 30% of the global oil supply gets shut down through the Straits of Hormuz. Lol, now they're talking about the impressive potential of "Deep Cardium" in Alberta. You know that old depleted oil field disvovered in the 1940s by Imperial Oil that put Alberta on the map as a major oil producer. Well guess what? It's nowhere near depleted. Still tens of billions of recoverable barrels with great net backs using new drilling and completions technology. 

They say that the Eagle Ford has only produced 8 to 10% of the OOIP (original oil in place) using old technology. They now reckon that they can get it up to 30% using new technology. Viola, depleted field now becomes Tier 1. Why do people think that bte bought Ranger? Why do people think that Exxon just spent $60 billion to buy Pioneer? Anyway my vote is to spend opetating income to "drill baby drill" in order to increase reserves and total assets and screw the fcf metrics.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>