RE:RE:RE:RE:Not derisked, not by a long shotsorrenson wrote: 20.2 is a list of all with estimates and could be concurrent or consecutive so useless at best
24.4 clearly states DRAFT for review so that and a dollar wont get you a coffee even then it goes to oct 2028 for operations if you get approved by 2025. and even better chart shows construction starts a year before approvals ..Yeah ok but but but "its a DRAFT"
DeputyDawg wrote: Actually there is a projected timeline.
If you read the feasibility study it's there in table 20.2 and at 24.4.
And Rick has already said he is seeking to meet those timelines quicker than stated.
Draft, estimated, projected, hope, guess - take your pick. Unless you are Nostradamus everything in the future is based on an educated appraisal of facts.
Simple enough - if you don't believe there is truthful intent to what you are being told then don't invest and move on.