RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Not gloatingHoldrrrr wrote: Holdrrrr wrote: LongoGlueStick wrote: tamaracktop wrote: I don't have shares, and I post with the interests of shareholders in mind.
That's about me.
It's the same old story with you Tamarack top. You did the same thing with x e b e c. You recommended the x e b e c stock and you didn't own any shares of it. You had no skin in the game. I honestly don't know how you can live with yourself. You caused investors to lose millions of dollars as a result of your poor recommendation to buy x e b e c. And you claim you're a Royal Bank employee for 35 years. You weren't very good at your job.
Tamarackflop couldn't see XeBeC's (definition is a pirate ship), was $150 million in debt, still telling people to buy.
He comes to pyr and raves that $20 million in receivables is late and blah blah, incredible eh?
What these bashers/influencers don't tell you, is the receivables rotate and refresh on and ongoing basis, so as receivables are added, some are deducted.
They are very sneaky how they word their bashing to decieve novice investors.
And I will add, I'm no expert, But if I was in Peter's shoes, I would have some money tucked away for protecting and defending patents, emergency fund to defend pyr in all aspects etc. They don't know anything about the Mellon trust, but assume they know everything.
The bashers/influencers bark "Pyr has no money to defend a patent" well considering Peter owns half the company and has for over 20 years, you better be damn sure he's broke before you try to use pyr technology against a patent.