Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Critical Elements Lithium Corp V.CRE

Alternate Symbol(s):  CRECF

Critical Elements Lithium Corporation is a Canada-based lithium exploration company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, development and processing of critical minerals mining properties in Canada. Its projects include Rose Lithium-Tantalum, Rose North, Rose South, Arques, Bourier, Dumulon, Duval, Nisk, Lemare, Caumont, and Valiquette. The Rose Lithium-Tantalum property consists of over 473 claims covering a total area of over 24.99 square kilometers (km2). It lies in the northeastern part of Superior Province, within the Eastmain greenstone belt. The Rose North property consists of about 31 claims covering a total area of over 16.14 km2. The Arques Property is composed of one block totaling around 136 claims covering an area of 6,840.93 hectares (ha) over 18 kilometers (kms) in length in a Southwest-Northeast direction. Bourier Property is comprised of over 304 claims with an area of 15,616.47 ha for over 30 kms. Rose South property consists of over 280 claims.


TSXV:CRE - Post by User

Post by Speedypeteon Nov 06, 2023 8:53am
152 Views
Post# 35719000

Canada should do the same indefinitely

Canada should do the same indefinitely South Korea is prohibiting stock short-selling until June 2024, in a move that triggered a big rally for equities and increased trading volumes. The benchmark KOSPI and the tech-heavy KOSDAQ soared 5.7% and 7.3%, respectively, resulting in both indexes closing out their best session since late March 2020. Short-selling is an investment strategy in which traders or hedge funds sell borrowed shares with the aim of buying them back later at a lower price. It's a risky and costly strategy that requires a margin account and collateral, with the potential for unlimited losses as the stock's price can rise indefinitely.

Snapshot: "The [South Korean] measure is aimed at fundamentally easing 'the tilted playing field' between institutional and retail investors," Financial Services Commission Chairman Kim Joo-hyun said at a news briefing. "Amid continued uncertainty in financial markets, major foreign investment banks have been engaged as a matter of practice in unfair trades... and we determined that it would be impossible to maintain fair trading discipline." The regulator added that it will also implement a zero-tolerance approach to illegal practices like naked short-selling, with a special investigation team to be established and "perpetrators facing criminal prosecution." Naked Short Selling: What It Is & How It Works

To note, South Korea had already banned short-selling during the coronavirus pandemic. The ban was lifted in May 2021 for trades of companies on the KOSPI and KOSDAQ with large market caps, but the restrictions have remained in place for more than 2,000 equities. It comes as a vocal group of retail investors has continued to complain about the impact of shorting, influencing public perception ahead of general elections for the National Assembly in April. However, according to exchange data, short-selling in South Korea only accounts for a fraction of the market, about 0.6% of the KOSPI and 1.6% of the KOSDAQ.

Over in the U.S.: The SEC has issued controversial bans on the short-selling of certain stocks before, covering hundreds of financial equities during the financial crisis of 2008, and it was again discussed during the banking crisis earlier this year. Many have cited that regulatory intervention was needed, at times, to protect companies and stabilize the market, which could have real-world effects like spooking depositors or prompting bank runs. Others have argued that the restrictions were not only unnecessary, but actually harmed market quality, stability and discovery. In turn, those could impact liquidity and pricing efficiency, while short-sellers may use other instruments like futures, options and swaps to get around any bans. SEC approves new rules on short sales and securities lending disclosures
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>