RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:pre-BTD and BTD
I think that if the amended protocol just leads to some patients getting treatments at 0,3,6 m vs now 0 and 6m, they will still look really good if that CR holds from 12 m after the last treatment.
If a few get a 2nd treatment at 9 or 12 m then those won't be interpreted quite the same way. I believe that the modification is partly about getting patient's to stay in the trial for the full 6 m rather than opting out at 3m when they get an NR results.
So overall, if you are CR from 6 to 18 months, that would still look good for AA, IMO.