FINAL RESEACH POSTI've placed much time in research on, Wellgreen. Why is this ?
Because.... nothing has been fully assembled since 2012.
Former junior websites are not accessable.
Some corp presentations still linger on, press readers.
Juniors adding addition zones makes it all the more difficult.
Present junior only
dates press releases back to, 2015. One has to dig deep,
before 2015 - to find and patch together all important details.
Such as, 2012 Tech Report - MET studies revealing 80% peridotite was used.
Much more detail in 2012 report than.... few mentions in 2023 PFS.
I've added a few extras on previous final wellgreen map.
Height of 2023 pit from base tp mountain peak.
If 2023 based the benches on, 10m and there are approx 40 benches
Then... one now can compare - large intercepts + drill pitch - to detrmain where
the drill ends - inside pit vs beyond pit mountain beyond pit depth.
- Added moutain small hump at base for comparison to 2023 pit hump.
- Added few more drill intercepts
- Made Johnson's intercept arrow longer to align with height measurement of pit.
- Added bench pit height
- J FE - Johnson far east hole. It's in the far east, fringing east. Bang on.
These additional images allow shareholders to compare,
2023 pit constraints - L x W x H
with mineral body based on, drill intercepts + factoring drill pitch
Questions to Ask ? Are all drills inside pit constraint ?
Does the 2023 pit accommodate big drill length and depth of intercepts ?
350m to 762m intercepts
vs pit L x W x H
Pit only appears 120m deep near mine portal vs drills are 300m+ deep.
My newer overlay image is pretty bang on. 2023 pit bottom to tip of mountain = 420m
versus - blue image 2023 40 x 10m benches = 400m
Here's a new image " take " on backside of mountain mineralization.
HOLE 188 portrays an opitical 2D illusion.
It appears in image as if it was drilled on north side.
BUT.... once the white peak lines are added =
188 is drilled on south side. Bang on with Tech report.
QUICKLY - scan the first image in post. ( 2023 pit - 400m to top ).
NOTE - Mountain is only half mined. Backside is still there.
I've outlined the peaks in image below to assist with distinguishing
south side from, north.
Backside of mountain = north.
2023 pit reveals entire back side of mountain is, unmined.
Look....what's on the backside.
2023 pit only shows front side of mountain mined.
Tech Report image - with overlays for reference.
2012 Fusion assays ( reveals, double nickel ( in just peridotites )
Titanium, Chromium are reveal with 11% iron in peridotites.
Notice how Rhodium is revealed
but.... Rubidium is not. 
Here's our Rubidium in, Peridotites. Higher grades than Rhodium.
Ru - 21.6 ng/g
But.... Rhodium is far pricer.
2012 - 80% peridotite blend
2014 - peridotite stock piled processed later - peridotite near same mineral %'s sulphide
2014 - dropped 38 yr mine life
2014 - 16yr + 8yr = 25 yr mine life + additonal 31 yrs = 56 yrs
2023 - 19.5 yr mine life - lol
Pit Shell # 5 above image Could it be..... pit shell # 20 - image below -
2023 pit model = 120m from mine portal elevation Versus - 900m deep ( top to bottom ) front image
Versus - 600m deep backside image
What I recommend others to read ? 2012 Tech Report 2014 teck Report Eye open for missing drills in reports Comments in previous post. Images with overlays, in posts ( take or leave ) just how i see the project.
Do your own DD
My posts are not investment advice.
I do own shares of, ncp.
Done resesrching. Yes, bumper bounced a few times, sometimes wrong sometimes right.
But eventually, zeroed in on what's most important.
Immense study.
Hope you've enjoyed.
Biggest irk ?
My words changing in post.
Some my own error, other times not.
Not able to revise after post is sent....grrrr.
lol
Cheers...