Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

CGX Energy Inc V.OYL

Alternate Symbol(s):  CGXEF

CGX Energy Inc. is a Canada-based oil and gas exploration company. It is focused on the exploration of oil in the Guyana-Suriname Basin and the development of a deep-water port in Berbice, Guyana. The Company, through one of its subsidiaries, holds an interest in a Petroleum Prospecting Licence (PPL) and related Petroleum Agreement (PA) on the Corentyne block in the Guyana Basin, offshore Guyana. The Company, through its subsidiary Grand Canal Industrial Estates, is constructing the Berbice Deep Water Port. This facility, located on the eastern bank of the Berbice River, adjacent to and north of Crab Island in Region 6, Guyana, is being constructed on 30 acres with 400 m of river frontage. Its subsidiaries include CGX Resources Inc., GCIE Holdings Limited and CGX Energy Management Corp. It is the operator of the Corentyne block and holds a 27.48% working interest. Its Wei-1 exploration well is located west of the Kawa-1 discovery in the northern region of the Corentyne block.


TSXV:OYL - Post by User

Post by westcanprideon Nov 11, 2023 10:27am
337 Views
Post# 35730098

Net pay…

Net pay…

Great paper below. I encourage everyone to read.

In short, net pay is determined not only by geological criteria but also parameters such as well completion methods, economical constraints, surface facilities and lastly oil price. 

By their own admission, not a single piece of work was completed by either management team to determine ways to produce Santonian pay. Instead, they reduced the pay significantly and never specified why? Come on fellas, don't be gutless cowards, specify what criteria you used to justify such low net pay. If China can produce hydrocarbons from very flow permeability reservoirs, surely you can as well. 


For over a year, all both teams could do was brag about how they were targeting channel axis sands in Wei and thus would hit the motherload... they did, as per June 28! To now waste an entire summer and come back with only a single sentence saying "lower permeability and natural flow"... give me a bloody break. They manipulated the data folks to make it look horrible.

look all over google. Countless reservoirs are produced despite lower permeability. This is not the 1970s where 300mD reservoirs are required.

Even Victor Vega, in his sloppy reply yesterday, couldn't even come up with a intelligent response. He knows they are purposefully lying with the intent of making it look bad.

I hope the authorities blast Frontera and make their lives hell. They manipulated data and they know it. 


https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410520309098

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>