RE:RE:RE:E3 Technical ReportWanderer1187 wrote: I added a link in the comment. The report published on OCT 25, 2023. What I meant by disagree is that I think they believe that their '16Mt' should be a higher number, but current practices meant the resource estimate had to be conducted according to what's on the books. Meanwwhile they belive it should be conducted in a different manner. I don't think you publish a report like that unless they believe their Measured and Indicated resource is inaccurately too low.
Again...if mgt has an issue with a tech repiort, they legally have to make it known & re-evaluate. That's an easy fidicuary
*You do realize it was 1st 24 mt's
* Peter Ehern did the work
Your link only went to the generalized page....nothing was specific