Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Gold Reserve Ltd V.GRZ

Alternate Symbol(s):  GDRZF

Gold Reserve Ltd., formerly Gold Reserve Inc., is an exploration stage company. The Company is engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing mining projects. The Company owns certain wholly owned mining claims known as the LMS Gold Project (the LMS Property), together with certain personal property. The LMS Property is situated approximately 20 kilometers (km) north of Delta Junction, and 150 km southeast of Fairbanks, Alaska in the Goodpaster Mining District. The LMS Property, located in Alaska, remains at an early stage of exploration with limited annual on-site activities being conducted by the Company.


TSXV:GRZ - Post by User

Comment by mrmoribundon Nov 16, 2023 1:50pm
130 Views
Post# 35739639

RE:RE:RE:RE:Order

RE:RE:RE:RE:OrderWhile of course it's possible the Supreme Court will hear it, the odds of that happening are probably not even one in a thousand.

The SC gets many thousands of applications each year and of those they typically agree to hear about 80. Also, if I understand the matter correctly, it tends to take cases which will have some relevance to thorny / timely Constitutional questions.

For the SC to hear this would be quite the slap in the face to the lower courts, which have said over and over that this is about as cut and dried as it gets.

FWIW, it would also throw a monkey wrench into all the workings of US foreign policy relative to Venezuela (pushing for free & fair elections) and, more broadly, all of Latin America.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>