Almonty Industries Inc T.AII

RE:RE:RE:Almonty Thought Project

[5ilverlining808]

1dollarinto2 wrote:

My favourite post in a long time, well done:)

Question for you on the NGO stuff. Once the concrete is down, is there much more surface disturbance? My thinking is the time for ecological complaints is pre-concrete, after that, you are just building on top of disturbed surface, so no further eco complaints?

The disturbed surface stuff should be meaningless anyway on this site, as a past producing mine; however, I do understand complainers like to complain:)

Corton's last post summed that up to a tee.
A lot of these people are just ex-dropout university students that spent more time protesting than focusing on their studies.

They should be applauding Almonty, as what you call "surface disturbance" actually began when Almonty started to demolish old derelict buildings, remove and dispose tonnes of asbestos roof sheeting safely, clean up old settling sumps and removal of contaminated soils, which all of this would still be there today since the end of the mine in the 1990's.

River and road diversion was next, a new portal, then site scalping, and now concrete and the build propper.
This whole site and project is now cleaner enviro-wise than ever before thanks to Almonty.
 These NGO groups are just the same as the "trolls" we get on all bullboards.
Its a bit like (no offence) a vegan or vegetarian who wants some thing that looks like meat, smells like meat, has the texture of meat and tastes like meat, but is not meat ????????????
I cant figure the logic in that one.

So yes 1dollar it is meaningless as the area has never been cleaner than now.