Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy for non–muscle- Discussion
NMIBC was known for its high recurrence rate. Many efforts were made to reduce the relapse, including surgery reformation (42, 43) and adjuvant treatments (44). But still, part of patients would experience recurrence and progression, and the prognosis of these patients is not satisfying.
PDT is an emerging method to eliminate tumor residues and has been a promising option for BCa. As a non-invasive intervention, PDT is well-tolerated and could be easily and widely used. More importantly, its mechanism is unique. Initially, the effect of PDT was attributed to the release of cytotoxic mediators such as singlet oxygen, which directly trigger anti-tumor effects. As mechanistic knowledge has grown, the multifaceted nature of PDT was understood, which is comprised of anti-vascular actions, multiple cell death pathways, together with innate and adaptive immune stimulations (45).
PDT has been clinically used in the treatment of NMIBC since the 1980s. However, different strategies were implemented by different medical centers, including the indications and treatment protocol. Such as in our analysis, the inclusion criteria were quite different, and the light energy of PDT ranged from 10-100 J/cm2. The lack of a standard protocol resulted in the absence of high-quality clinical evidence, which prevents the widespread use of PDT. To the best of our knowledge, no systematic review or meta-analysis is available to provide a comprehensive summary of the clinical utility of PDT in NMIBC.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we introduced a pioneering classification of PDT according to the tumor status prior to PDT. Therapeutic PDT is defined as PDT applied to eliminate unresectable lesions. Adjuvant PDT was defined as PDT conducted for prophylaxis of recurrence, before which the visible lesions were eliminated. Notably, PDT was mostly applied to these high-risk patients who failed or were unsuitable for standard treatments.
As shown in Table 1, some patients could have multiple or diffuse tumors, and complete resection by conventional TURBT might be unfeasible. For these patients, therapeutic PDT presents a satisfying efficacy rate. As seen in Figure 3A, 68% (95% CI: 59%-77%) of these patients were tumor-free after PDT. More surprisingly, the tumor-free status could be long-term in many cases (Supplement Figure 1). 12 months after PDT, over half of the CR patients remain tumor-free. 24 months after PDT, about a third of these patients still did not experience recurrence. These results indicate that, when complete resection of tumors is surgically unfeasible, PDT might provide an extra tumor-free survival and delay the RC for part of patients.
Especially, our analysis suggested that Tis patients could also benefit from PDT. As shown in Figure 3B and Supplement Figure 2, PDT could achieve a CR rate of 68%, and less than a third of these patients could maintain tumor-free for over 2 years. Currently, the recommended treatment for Tis is RC or TURBT combined with intravesical BCG. Intravesical BCG could induce a CR rate of about 75% in Tis patients, and the five-year recurrence-free rate of complete responders was > 50% (46, 47). Statistically, intravesical BCG outperformed PDT in the treatment of Tis and should be preferred for these patients. But for BCG-unresponsive or intolerant patients, PDT could still be an alternative.
PDT could also be an efficient adjuvant option after standard TURBT. In clinical practice, intravesical BCG or chemotherapy is the standard treatment for intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC, especially BCG therapy. For BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, RC is recommended by guidelines (3, 4). Our results indicate that PDT might be an effective treatment for these patients, since PDT could achieve a recurrence-free rate of 68% (95% CI:51%-86%) at 12 months and 56% (95% CI:32%-81%) at 24 months in BCG-unresponsive patients (Figure S3). These results have illustrated that PDT is feasible for these refractory NMIBCs which are unsuitable for conventional treatment.
Complications of PDT could be well-managed currently. Local complications including LUTS and hematuria would present in > 90% of patients, but they were mostly transient and could be solved by symptomatic treatments. Skin photosensitivity is common before, but when novel photosensitizers were intravesically administrated, protection against exposure to light was no longer needed (19, 21). Besides, when 5-ALA were orally given, protection from sunlight for 24 hours is enough to avoid phototoxic skin reaction (39), which is much shorter than 4-6 weeks of protection after intravenous administration of the first-generation photosensitizers. Bladder contracture is the most serious complication of PDT due to fibrosis triggered by unspecific light reactions in the normal muscle layer (48). The excessive light dose could be an important reason for it (29). Due to the improvement of photosensitizer selectivity and application of intravesical administration, the bladder contracture was not reported anymore.
The present systematic review and meta-analysis were performed based on previously published literature. Several limitations should be noted. All these studies were single-arm case series. The relatively low quality compromised the strength of our conclusions and the results should be interpreted with caution. Additionally, the inconsistent inclusion criteria in different studies prevent a clear description of the beneficiary. Besides, the heterogeneity in study design, photosensitizer type, and photosensitizer administration did not conclude a present standard protocol of PDT, which is important for the conducting of further high-quality research.
Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that PDT could provide certain cancer control for these recurrent, high-risk, or BCG-unresponsive BCa. However, the research on PDT is still inadequate, and the application of PDT in BCa needs much more exploration.
First, further studies with proper design and higher quality are needed to ascertain and extend the beneficiary of PDT. As discussed above, a standard protocol for PDT is urgently needed.
Second, the beneficiary of PDT needs to be determined by future studies. It should be noted that PDT was currently used as a second-line option in high-risk NMIBC. Whether NMIBC, including intermediate- and low-risk, could benefit from the early combination of PDT and intravesical chemotherapy or BCG therapy as first-line treatment needs to be determined.
Third, Last, PDT has unique mechanisms, that might further enhance the efficacy of traditional therapy (49). Adding PDT to conventional intravesical chemotherapy or BCG therapy has been explored for refractory NMIBC (32, 34, 50). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were also emerging options for NMIBC (51, 52). A combination of PDT and ICIs could also be a new way to control NMIBC (53, 54). Further high-quality clinical trials are warranted to confirm the efficacy of these combinations.
Last, Intuitively, enhancing the selectivity and permeability of photosensitizers could be a feasible strategy. Presently, third-generation photosensitizers have been developed by conjugating photosensitizers to molecules that target tumor biomarkers (55). In BCa, cellular and animal experiments of third-generation photosensitizers have been conducted and indicate reinforced PDT efficacy (56, 57).
Conclusion
Presently, PDT was clinically applied to high-risk NMIBC, including diffuse Tis and those that are resistant to standard of care. Although high-level evidence is still lacking, current studies suggested that both therapeutic and adjuvant PDT present satisfying safety and efficacy. As a promising option for NMIBC, PDT deserves further exploration by future high-quality research.
Frontiers | Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis (frontiersin.org)