RE:RE:RE:G&M coverage this afternoonLOL, I find it hilariously hypocritical that the G&M chastises me for trying to read their news articles without paying for a subscription when somehow Facebook and google can survive on ad revenues rather than subscriptions. This "game" of advertising revenue versus subscription fees has been going on for 100 years. It's a vicious circle they just can't comprehend that the more they charge subscribers, the fewer they will have, and the fewer they have, the lower the ad revenues due to circulation or "eyeballs" seeing those ads. If it was free, or 99 cents a month, subscribers would skyrocket and they could charge advertisers more. But they don't, and won't ever, get this. On top of this is the arrogant hypocrisy of the old G&M, aka, the mop and pail, using Reuters reports and stories as if it was G&M content. Watch for it. You can google most of the G&M stories using Reuters and the key words from the globe headline and find the original story on the Reuters website........for FREE. Super LOLOLOL!