RE:Regarding the growing CCUS show......... Sounds like a real useless endeavor. Where are the experts??? Axe is looking a million times attractive after reading the second article. The first thing i thought of exactly what was stated taking the carbon funneling it underground to possibly add more heat to the well i thought wouldnt that cause dangerous circumstances doing that? When you look in the article it is looking to see if they may cause seismic activities.
If the carbon is being emitted as stated and funneled down the more you want to use the capture to heat the well is contingent on more and more heat which defeats the purpose as carbon release is the source to keep heating the well how stupid is that? Where as you have focused and concentrated heat through rf and it is quite intermittment. The capture piping and equipments will definitely cost way more than the darn tech axe has. I hope axe is very proactive with the Canadian Government and explain a common sense thing the second article talks about.
I dont get all the stupidity and that too Pathway actually entertaining this type of tech ieyah i thought they are smarter than this apparently not that isnt even rocket science and a journalust lay person can see how stupid of an idea all this funneling is oh boy we really need to get smarter elected officials who bloody think before touting stupidity and why i have emphasized a national energy plan where neutral scuentist take a hard good look at all spurces and sees all their costs benefits take it extremely vigourously before throwing away money stupidly.
Anyways thanks for these articles great read and just makes me even more entrenched over here. I strongly believe some form of reason will win out if people stupidly want to waste money in a real stupid endeavor and others see it for what they are those who move smartly will be the big winners. Pathway is way off path folks this is a stupid losing proposition dont do it thats all i can say to our partners. I may be upset how things are and have been going down and speaking as neutrally as i can i saw problems with it right off the bat to the exact things statec. You are going to use carbon to heat to produce more carbon sounds bad and what about how all that will affect below the surface.
Would be interesting if this company can expand on all this scientifically radio frequency vs these underground piping carbon capture systems. The company did say it will be costly and unproven but what about the environmental impact and show what that will likely be vs rf. Underground carbon epic fail i would kill it right away. This is as stupid if not more when BC was trying to fuel lng with dirty fuel coal steam. Lng was a real stupid idea for BC for severak reasons i was always against for being dirty and it woud have been and glutted witb Australia and US being way agead. There was a huge loss of money yet it was all the hyoe and craze stupidly researched. Boy governments are so stupid they badly need a national energy plan to avoud or greatly reduced such stupidity and spur of the moment decisiins without understandung the science and piut shiate loads of money into thingd.