RE:what I don't understand isgibbonsj wrote: Personally I think we should have stuck with the ATM. The thing is though for the right acquisition there are many ways of financing it. ATM is the most shareholder friendly but for the right acquisition dilution by other means does not necessarily means devaluation of shares. I have seen it many times over the years where the acquisition, being transformational, gives sp a large boost. This occurs when shareholders or stakeholders of the company being acquired buy shares in the acquiring company, new blood so to speak. What I don't understand though is posters like tropical have been posting here for years they have made it clear ad nauseam that they think this is a garbage investment. So why haven't they sold and moved on? What do they see in this stock that makes them hold tight onto their shares? Why didn't they sell at $9.
So here's the thing gibby, I read this post and really come to the conclusion that these words only speak of your own opinion and speculation. Nothing informative or factual for that matter, your entitled to your opinions just like myself and everyone else on this board.
As soon as the opinions differ, the problems start. Doesn't matter what you think I should be doing, it is none of your business and you have no idea as to my holdings or my trading history.
We all post our opinions and then wait for judgement from the critics that think they know better and advice on what we should be doing.
Thanks Gibby, I'm good. Have a great day.