SHIFT THE FOCUSWhen one takes the focus off of sulphides, places it on, silicates / crystolines
then brings forward the other geo analysis that is counter to sulphide hydrothermal
its then...The statement Wellgreen deposit is very rare, compared to Russia's Norilsk.
Speaking of the silicates
Miller (1991) found that the disseminated mineralization is preferentially enriched in copper, platinum, palladium and gold compared to the massive sulphides. Sulphur isotope data suggest that most of the sulphur was assimilated from deep crustal sources and was not derived from footwall rocks.
https://data.geology.gov.yk.ca/Occurrence/14129#InfoTab
Wellgreen is not your typical Aussie or Timmins nickel laterite deposit.
It's enriched in platinum group including several exotics.
Mineralization is not exclusive to just gabbs and sulphides.
Which is all the more reason why,
Wellgreen should not have seen a Mg CO2 program.
Instead - Wellgreen should have ran with a platinum CO2 offset
- platinum hydrogen
- platinum CO reduction to CO2 ( 50% / 100% ) emission tech
What happens if they did choose this path ?
14% - 20+% Mg becomes a credit $$$
14% Iron stand alone credit in silicates ( ties in other drill holes )
Justifies mining all the silicates
Ore body becomes unified
Waste becomes valued ores
2014 model stockpiled silicated to be processed later.
They were on the right path in, 2014
So why were several personel swithed up, even geo ?
lol
Next... 2012 Peridotites MET tests reveal
2 kinds of nickel
chromium
titanium
In the peridotite silicates
lol
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53314406722_f0c05143da_z.jpg
which further supports the mining of silicates.
This is how to build and strengthen the value of the, Wellgreen.
Not to mention, keep the original boundaries same.
Shift focus to silicates
= well over 70% of the ores.
Cheers....