RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:28 places in this most recent private placementOilminerdeluxe wrote: That fast AA.approval we hope for. Wasn't it said that results had to be similar to the Phase 1 data? Like 67% CR? We are not there. Is it enough to be just better than the competition t be eligible for AA?
It is true that the initial discussions TLT had with the FDA that 66% figure may have been used but only because that was what they saw in phase 1, with very few patients. Obviously a CR % ike that would be a no brainer for the FDA to give AA. One of the Dr. Ks, I forget which one, said that 30% CR would be a great %. I am guessing you are correct that we just need to be better than the current SoC to get AA. And in our case that is only for late stage NMIBC...