RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Yesterday's Trans Mountain Expansion Variance DecisionIf that one liner by CER qualities as a scientifically justifyable decision, with no explanations given,
I believe Trans Mountain has grounds for an appeal, including the recovery of additional costs this peril that was identified by Trans Mountain prompting the request for variance the CER chose to ignore. I did not take it seriously, how could I?
By the way, this was the briefest decision I have ever seen. That was why I skipped over it.
To deal with a major and economically importan project in this fashion is cavalier and unacceptable.
Problem is that we, the taxpayers will have to foot the legal bill for the defence of the spiteful members of CER, who clearly appear to have a hidden agenda i this case.
If as you say there were no responses by the natives, why did CER directed Trans Mountain to send
a copy to them? Why didn't they do it? Odd.