RE:RE:RE:Imminent CanabalismMostlyserious wrote: Agree. Maybe they want to counter the pumping that could attract the "young inexperienced deer". However, I would say that the trend is not share price friend so if the "young inexperienced deer" don't see that as a red flag that they should look into, then it is simply something basic that they will have to learn and should serve them well into the future.
Pumpers have to do better than to continue suggesting something is about to go up because of the number of critics, especially since they have been singing that song....forever....and the results are anything but.
If, when PYR starts delivering results that can lead to profits and positive cashflow, that's when there should be a sustainable turn in the share price trend. It is that simple, and does not matter what anyone here says.
Really well written, and summarizes the bull/bear perspective well.
I dont think anyone following this company that has seen the red flags is here to convert pumpers.
There are many motivations, yet I do think it is admirable that those that are providing a balanced, evidence based perspective that the "inexperienced deer" may benefit from hearing and considering.(research show they are often not young chronologically-often elderly investors new to the market)
Many dont own shares or have a financial interest but prior experiences in small caps have motivated the desire to help. For me I was asked to come by one of the promoters here-Science First-as he promoted this on another board. He left after the AMF alleged fraud with the company-as did develop bc.
I think its entertaining that pumpers repeat the mantra that the volume of posts is correlated with business pro-spectacle of a company. Reserach again, shows that negative sentiment is positively correlated with negative financial data.
I also think it amusing that those that post evidence based posts, based on the companies financials and filings, are deemed to be somehow making negative comments about the management. Show me one post where I have done that. I am posting based on the data the company has posted. So if this is bashing ergo the company is bashing.
Silly logic isn't it?