RE:Questionable interview to say the leastOf course, had Lisa just left without assisting in the transition, some posters would claim the rats were abandoning the ship (red flag).
If Reliq had tapped an outsider to take over as interim CEO, some posters would claim the company would essentially be a lame duck for months until the new guy got up to speed (red flag).
If the company had run without a CEO in place until a new permanent one was found, some posters would claim the uncertainty and a likely rushed CEO replacement process would be too risky for shareholders (red flag).
In fact, one can come up with negative spin for any scenario that might have been selected. The one they actually chose seems like the best one to me. The new guy knows the issues. He'll listen to Lisa, but use his own analytical skills and independent thinking to guide the company. At least, that's what would normally happen in such a situation as this.
How about we collect some actual data before spinning endless negative scenarios...
Upsdowns wrote: Who's advising the new temporary ceo again? Oh that's right, it's lisa Crossley. So you could say that chris was told what to say by lisa, couldn't you? Sounds reasonable to me. Now, I'll give him credit for not reaching into the past to use terms like bottleneck or learning curve or bringing up other negativity, but his relationship with lisa goes all the way back to Natrix Separations. So, how much do you trust him now? One more obvious point that all the other blogger's ( possibly blogger) refuse to mention. The timing of this interview may suggest what Chris's intentions are. Right before tax loss selling ends. Any red flags here lol?