RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Sale will go forward.Slappyjo, it would appear you were correct in your concerns. Thanks for that link.
I did not realize that the "Six Creditors" were currently not, technically, "Sale Process Parties." (If they were then there would be no issue.)
That said, the "reply in support of motion" gives the impression that this should fairly quickly be fixed. Hard to see what basis there could be for the Court to NOT grant the simple thing the good guys are asking for.
Top marks to the lawyers for recognizing this issue. Would be an easy thing to overlook.
Talk about egg on the faces if that were to happen.
And I'm sure you're right about the Crystallex owners.