StarSearcher80 - Please helpHi StarSearcher80. Firstly, let me please appologies for any previous annomosity.
Secondly, I am struggling to understand how Nano can mitigate against the SpringPower MCAM process technology that was aquired by Tesla. Tesla has stated they are using this SpringPower MCAM process tech (based on the SpringPower patents) to make their own LFP CAM in North America using local supply chains as inputs.
As in, they are basically doing exaclty what Nano is trying to do but Tesla has all the resources in the world to build their facilities and they are years ahead of Nano in building their LFP CAM facility.
I'm hoping you have thought this issue through and can offer some input to put Nano One investor's minds at ease.
Many long term investors of Nano One have known about the SpringPower MCAM patents for some time so I'm hoping someone in our community can explain how Nano One's One Pot process is superior or better yet how the SpringPower MCAM patents might encroach on the One Pot patents.
It seems like Tesla is going to commission their commercial north american LFP CAM facility soon so surely if Nano One had a piece of that facility it would have already been announced. Is that our only protection as Nano One investors that somehow Nano will get a piece of that new commercial LFP CAM MCAM Tesla facility?
Again, let me please appologies for any previous annomosity Starsearcher80. I do appreciate the content you share with our community.