RE:Board of Directors compensationfossi, you are well known for your PGX fantasy calling for a rapid tripling of CZO's revenue without the need to invest in a PGX plant. Amazing. No plant needed. Are you now suggesting that Ronnie Miller should work for free or at below market rates? Do you have any evidence the rates were excessive given the process underway? Are you suggesting that because Ronnie Miller was compensated by the world's largest biotech company for 20 years that he couldn't do his job at Roche and that Roche kept him on over 20 years because he duped Roche? People get compensated for their good work. From all I've seen Ronnie Miller is a good man who attained the pinnacle of success in Canada's biotech industry as arguably Canada's most important biotech executive. Do you have evidence to the contrairy? Is it right for you to defame him without evidence?
fossi_2002 wrote: https://d1io3yog0oux5.cloudfront.net/_3dd96286f546ebf41e5c58b30efbc4c7/ceapro/db/191/842/pdf/Ceapro+Q3+2023+Financial+Report_Web.pdf
Please take a close look at page 6
General and Administration:
Board of Directors compensation
3 months sept. 229 after 120
9 months sept. 696 after 254
Do you now know why Miller is excited or enthusiastic?