RE:RE:Argonaut Goldpsych01 wrote: Sclary---giving Argonautgold a run for his/her money. You forgot to address the main issue, the probability of a reverse split---if credibility is important, if one wishes to rant pages of a glittering future, one must address all things, even those things which cause fear. To date we have a meaningless hearsay account that management is/was not considering a rollback which equates to a politician saying something about an important issue--taken with a grain of salt. Until managers state unequivocally that a reverse split is out of the question, and show why in absolute terms, this stock will stay where it is give or take a few pennies. Were they to do as I suggest, it will double overnite. IMO
agree the other thing with a RS is what the ratio will be is it a :
10 to 1 ......really bad
5 to 1......still uggg
2 to 1 ....a bit of a nothing burger really and probably acceptable to most shareholders if done for a really good reason...like really good