Nickel Creek Platinum Corp T.NCP

Alternate Symbol(s): NCPCF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals

Nickel Creek Platinum Corp. is a Canada-based mining exploration and development company. The Company’s principal business activity is the exploration and evaluation of nickel and platinum group metals (PGM) mineral properties in North America. Its flagship asset is its 100%-owned nickel-copper PGM project, located in the Yukon Territory, Canada (Nickel Shaw Project). The project is in the southwest of Canada's Yukon Territory, approximately 317 kilometers (km) northwest (NW) of the capital, Whitehorse. The Nickel Shaw Project is a large undeveloped nickel sulphide project, with a unique mix of metals including copper, cobalt and platinum group metals. The Nickel Shaw Project has access to infrastructure, located three hours west of Whitehorse via the paved Alaska Highway, which further offers year-round access to deep-sea shipping ports in southern Alaska. The Company also maintains environmental baseline activities, considers optimization alternatives and seeks other opportunities.

TSX:NCP - Post by User

Nickel Creek Platinum Corp

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Post by Wangotango67on Jan 26, 2024 9:18am

77 Views

Post# 35846753

PHASE 2 - MET TESTS

Mini Pilot Plant created a bulk concentrate.
Nickel - 6.08 %
Copper - 3.06 %

The goal is to separate the two minerals and end up with same %'s
but each mineral unto it's own concentrate.

Nickel successfully separates from copper but...
Nickel % increases in 2nd lock test = 0.43 % ?

Commercial next phase
Nickel continues to increase to 6.7 %
= 0.72% greater than initial value

Copper goes off the chart to 13.8 %
then with final commercial outcome spikes to 18 %
= nearly 15% greater than initial value.

Again,
this phase 2 process was to simply separate the two minerals.

Now... based on initial bulk con and recovery rates it would take
= approx 43 tonnes to achieve the original - Nickel - 6.08 % + Copper - 3.06 %

There's a good 10+% to 14% iron in silicates
I'm thinking - course grind inhibited true mineral percentages
Perhaps a reagent was used in lock cycle
Or... original chloride copper was over looked in silicate solution
and once sulphide acid introduced
Equipt dialed in for sulphide minerals was now able to reconize the copper

Phase 2 majority ore was from central zone.
https://www.nickelcreekplatinum.com/investors/news-releases/press-release-details/2017/Wellgreen-Platinum-Provides-2017-Drill-Program-Update/default.aspx

18 % copper using 43 ore tonnes from original bulk would place the Cu grade at
= 0.418 %

What mineral % are shown in 2012 ( 80% peridotite blend )
Page 276
https://secure.kaiserresearch.com/i/jk/tr16/TRNKL20120801.pdf

BIGGEST QUESTION ?
If 2012 MET revealed solution nickel - what are the odds copper chloride ?
Maybe... phase 2 MET couldn't detect the chloride copper, but...if sulphur acid was used
and it was indeed used to soften ores ( press ) equipt seeking sulphide could then detect it.

RE Phase 2 MET Chart ( 18 % circled )

B.C.
Decair + Baptise nickel deposits are similar ( to a degree ) to that of wellgreen.
Magnesium
Dunite
Peridotite
Olivine
Serpentine
Iron
Calcium

Same Ocean sediments pushing inland.

Ocean Sediment Floor Rises,
Reefs ------> stable land to mountains to sediment booking or disenimation.

FPX has very low grades.
Yet is still able to capture 90% of low grade in solution.

Pit 1 vs Pit 5 ( jagged V pit outline )
Even dunite is mineralized.
Open at depth
Johnson hole began outside pit 1 shell - dunite still mineralized
2015 - 2018 - wow.