RE:DateThank you! So that refers specifically to THC-O... a new molecule which (AFAIK) is not in Glacial Gold products. Interestingly, in the video Paul does say Excise Tax on Glacial Gold products can be "anywhere from 40%-50%". So when you see that graph of Nextleaf's softgel sales doing better than their other products... just be aware that half the Revenue could be going straight out the door to the CRA. Canadabis had this problem; the more THC you give customers, the more Tax you pay to the CRA... but you're not able to fully recover it through higher pricing as there's a limit to what consumers will pay for extra THC (and Nextleaf doesn't even try, it prices low). High THC products at low prices is a tricky dynamic, because the tax is based on milligrams not revenue. Interesting date on the video too... just after the majority of the unidentified payables were accrued, vastly in excess of their Revenue or COGS growth (which was basically flat during the period Dec20-Jun22)... so it's unlikely to be liabilities for plant biomass procurement or unpaid staff wages.