RE:RE:RE:RE:I'm surprised there hasn't been more discussion about this..100% correct - that is one of the benefits for two legally separate enties.
I was thinking more about how existing SBM shareholders have been subordinated and the distribution of $ upon a theoretical bankrupcy. SBM investors are still last in line, but the line just got larger with the insertion of SL creditors.
We've seen how SBM management rewards themselves... taking value out of SBM through large bonuses. Now we have 2 levels of this... for starters.
If you believe AA is the miracle molecule to make all these years of waiting worthwhile... you want to hold SL shares more than SBM shares. We've not been given that chance.
I'm surprised you seem to be ok with this latest shell game move.
I've raised my concern and said my peace.
GLTA