RE:A LOT OF LITHIUM BUT AT DEPTHThe cost of removing over burden will have to fit in to the metric of economic viability. It's been done plenty of times before. I owned Hudson Bay when their Rosemont project was killed by a bureaucrat at the finish line of approval. They were going to remove a kajillion tons of overburden to get to the copper & stack it 10 meters high covering hundreds of acres. Anyway, if the pricing works out, it's just a cost of doing business. In remote Nevada, doubtful anyone would protest stacks of overburden close by. The thing you hit on, at 0.1% Lithium, that's a very fine line of profitability to operate on when you add an extra $5-7 ton to remove the over burden. In situ mining is fraught with technical risk in good situations. Getting lithium out of clay, don't know if that's possible with a solution. First up, they have to prove up this resource. Inferred resources are worth a whopping zero in share price. It has to be measured & Indicated. Drilling is how they will get there. 1,000 ppm Lithium is respectable & doable, so I believe they will get there. It's a question of how much volume they can put in M+I. Lithium & Lithium carbonate prices should keep falling, there's just too much of it now. Where is the real bottom of Li determines which projects are viable & which are fantasy. I am hopeful enough to step in now with this MRE. This is a better speculation than many Cu & Ni mines in exploration stage. They will have to dilute quite a bit to get to a PEA, but if there really are 1 million tons of Li than we will all make out like bandits.