So, just to be clear then quinlash, you feel that Irwin Simon IS in fact worth $15 to $25 million in compensation annually - and should receive bonuses on top of that for increasing net sales - those bonuses don't need to be tied to Positive Cash Flow or Net Profit.
And you say that, fully aware that Tilrays Net Sales have increased through acquisition of other companies, not organic growth - and those other companies were acquired mainly through the issurance of shares, and that share dilution reduces investor ownership.
Do you recall posting that in your opinion "SSL was a visionary" when he was CEO of Hexo, and who utilized the exact same 'growth by acquisition' strategy that Simon uses? Of course, SSL was eventually turfed by the Board for vitually bankrupting Hexo.
I reach you thought SSL was worth the 'luxuriant' compensation he received from Hexo, as well.
Comment by
quinlashon Feb 01, 2024 9:53pm 
18 Views
Post# 35858610
RE:Tilray Shareholders - APPROVE of CEO Irwin Simon
If the CEO of Tilray can continue growing net sales at the rate at which he is then I'll vote to approve a bonus for him, how's that ?
The fact is that those at the top get paid top dollars, that applies for anyone, even someone doing the same job as yourself can get paid better if they do a better job than you and others.
Why would this be news to anyone old enough to have a job ???